> On 14 Jan 2025, at 13:58, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's not as clear-cut as I thought. To avoid regressions, I've gone
> back to an earlier idea to pass the direction to the comparator, but
> this time keep it simple by using the same comparator for sort and
> unique, similar to v9.
Looks good to me.
Nice stats for some cleaning up 34 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-).
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
