Re: update, truncate and vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Luke Lonergan
Subject Re: update, truncate and vacuum
Date
Msg-id C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF8044A19A1@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to update, truncate and vacuum  (Scott Feldstein <scott.feldstein@hyperic.com>)
List pgsql-performance

1) Yes

All rows are treated the same, there are no in place updates.

2) No

Truncate recreates the object as a new one, releasing the space held by the old one.

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Scott Feldstein [mailto:scott.feldstein@hyperic.com]
Sent:   Thursday, July 26, 2007 06:44 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject:        [PERFORM] update, truncate and vacuum

Hi,
I have a couple questions about how update, truncate and vacuum would 
work together.

1) If I update a table foo (id int, value numeric (20, 6))
with
update foo set value = 100 where id = 1

Would a vacuum be necessary after this type of operation since the 
updated value is a numeric? (as opposed to a sql type where its size 
could potentially change i.e varchar)

2) After several updates/deletes to a table, if I truncate it, would 
it be necessary to run vacuum in order to reclaim the space?

thanks,
Scott

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Feldstein
Date:
Subject: update, truncate and vacuum
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Affect of Reindexing on Vacuum Times