Re: Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFJ2qyA7eWfu0XLE77zhN88jMeQTxBBD_J-Uw=7YWkG_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Erik,

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 12:42, Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> 0001-Catalog-and-DDL-for-partitioned-tables-20.patch
>> 0002-psql-and-pg_dump-support-for-partitioned-tables-20.patch
>> 0003-Catalog-and-DDL-for-partitions-20.patch
>> 0004-psql-and-pg_dump-support-for-partitions-20.patch
>> 0005-Teach-a-few-places-to-use-partition-check-quals-20.patch
>> 0006-Tuple-routing-for-partitioned-tables-20.patch
>> 0007-Update-DDL-Partitioning-chapter-to-reflect-new-devel-20.patch
>
>
> Patches apply, compile, check OK.

Thanks!

> But this yields a segfault:
>
> begin;
> create schema if not exists s;
> create table s.t (c text, d text, id serial) partition by list
> ((ascii(substring(coalesce(c, d, ''), 1, 1))));
> create table s.t_part_ascii_065 partition of s.t for values in ( 65 );
>
> it logs as follows:
>
> 2016-12-07 17:03:45.787 CET 6125 LOG:  server process (PID 11503) was
> terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
> 2016-12-07 17:03:45.787 CET 6125 DETAIL:  Failed process was running: create
> table s.t_part_ascii_065 partition of s.t for values in ( 65 );

Hm, will look into this in a few hours.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_background contrib module proposal
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take