Planet posting policy - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Dave Page |
---|---|
Subject | Planet posting policy |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxow3T9g-Cpt+B437vgCoYL+y83+LCYVw8Z42SnW3ciUB1g@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Planet posting policy
Re: Planet posting policy Re: Planet posting policy |
List | pgsql-www |
Hi, We currently have a strict posting policy for planet.postgresql.org (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Planet_PostgreSQL), which has been applied in such a way that it prevents users posting anything to their syndicated blogs which may be remotely considered to be advertising. This has tripped up a number of our regular contributors in the past, including some senior community members who have posted technical content about their work which happens to be on commercial products around PostgreSQL. I'd like to propose relaxing this policy (or perhaps the interpretation of it) to allow useful content to be posted that happens to be centered around commercial products, whilst being careful to avoid pure advertising content which we certainly do not want (and should continue to be posted as news or pgsql-announce articles). The current policy has the following notes guiding on its interpretation: --- The primary test here is whether the information provided would be of some use even to people who have no interest in the commercial product mentioned. Consider what your entry would look like if all references to the product were removed. If there's no useful PostgreSQL content left after doing that, that post is an ad. --- I'd like to suggest changing that to something like the following: --- The primary test here is whether the information provided could be considered pure advertising. Consider what the article would look like if all references to any products were removed. If there is technical content remaining that may be considered interesting to those working with or around PostgreSQL, or the post is in some way describing the "state of the art" (as related to PostgreSQL), then it is suitable for syndication on Planet. In contrast, if all the remains is a list of features with no technical discussion around their implementation, then that is not suitable for syndication. --- I'm not wed to that wording - in fact I'm sure we can do better. However, I hope the intent is clear. Whilst we have had one or two cases where pure advertising has been removed from Planet, their have also been cases where potentially interesting posts have had to be removed due to the strictness of the policy interpretation, which is unfortunate for everyone. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company