Re: Materialized View Patch File - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers
From | Dave Page |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Materialized View Patch File |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxowcdH1A_5NNagkOOc6gK-+Yk-ede1zuEuo6f=mLU9qVyQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Materialized View Patch File (Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Materialized View Patch File
|
List | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > We can combine the Materialization Tab and auto-vacuum tab. > > To make it consistent with other UI I would suggest to have one Tab called > "Materialization" and in that tab we have another three Tabs. > > 1. Options ( Or we can have another name ) ---- For setting the option for > materialized view > 2. Table > 3. Toast Table There are only two options aren't there (Materialised: Yes/no and fill factor)? If so, I'd have one tab with those options at the top, then a "Vacuum Options" panel below that with 2 tabs for the vacuum stuff. I think that'll fit just fine. > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Please find the patch in attachement with below changes. >> >> --- Changed the UI design and make it consistence with dlgTable. >> >> When user creates the view then user has option to create Normal View Or >> Materialized View. >> User is not allowed to change the "Security Barrier" and "Materialized >> View" at the same time because "Security Barrier" option is for Normal View. >> >> So we put the below message >> >> "Security barrier and materialized view can not be enbale at the same >> time" >> >> Let me know if any modification is required. >> >> Thanks, >> Neel Patel >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Dave Page <dave.page@enterprisedb.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dave Page <dave.page@enterprisedb.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Neel Patel >>> >> <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Hi Dave, >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks for update. >>> >> > >>> >> > Yes it is a bug, I have not put the version check. >>> >> > >>> >> > Below are the changes. >>> >> > --- Put the PG version check for mat views >>> >> > --- In SQL Pane window change the the description of the view from >>> >> > -- >>> >> > MATERIALIZED View: xxx TO >>> >> > -- Materialized View: xxx >>> >> > >>> >> > Please find the updated patch in attachement. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks - a few more comments now I've tested further: >>> >> >>> >> - The tab should be called "Materialization" (unless someone has a >>> >> better >>> >> idea) >>> >> >>> > I will fix it. >>> > >>> >> >>> >> - I can still enable the "Materialized View" option on a 9.2 database >>> >> on the dialogue. >>> >> >>> > >>> > I will fix it. >>> > >>> >> >>> >> - I can't select a tablespace from the drop down menu, but I can type >>> >> a name in. Should be select-only - see dlgTable. >>> > >>> > >>> > I will fix it. >>> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - The vacuum options UI design should match the existing one on >>> >> dlgTable (it's a nice design, but consistency comes first). >>> > >>> > >>> > Can we change dlgTable with new UI design ? >>> >>> Not for this release, it's too late. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Page >>> Chief Architect, Tools & Installers >>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >>> >>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com >>> Twitter: @pgsnake >> >> > -- Dave Page Chief Architect, Tools & Installers EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake
pgadmin-hackers by date: