On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:01 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Given that we haven't run into this before, it seems like a reasonable
> bet that the problem will seldom arise. So as long as we have a
> cross-check I'm all right with calling it good and moving on. Expending
> a whole lot of work to improve the situation seems uncalled-for.
All right. Well, I'm on record as not liking that solution, but
obviously you can and do feel differently.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com