Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYPbvC+n=1sapSkGD3G+XzhShGJBOa-YaDFp=g0TD29sw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 6:20 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> yikes, you are right about the "reason" member. Attached 0002 removes
> it, and I'll go ahead and fix it in the back branches too.

I think changing this in the back-branches is a super-bad idea. If you
want, you can add a comment in the back-branches saying "oops, we
shipped a field that isn't used for anything", but changing the struct
definition is very likely to make 0 people happy and >0 people
unhappy. On the other hand, changing this in master is a good idea and
you should go ahead and do that before this creates any more
confusion.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Sophie Alpert"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix missing EvalPlanQual recheck for TID scans
Next
From: Emmanuel Sibi
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] PostgreSQL crashes with ThreadSanitizer during early initialization