Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYgf1SX-Ersz2bw0N-uKRcerkYoYNk=+R6iwxNPD2OHUQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Timing overhead and Linux clock sources
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> He wrote it that way to allow for simpler C code --- he could just start
> from 31 and keeping skipping entries until he hit a non-zero.
>
> My format makes it easy to see which line should have the majority of
> the entries, e.g. first line should be > 90%.  I doubt there are enough
> people running this cross-version that consistency in output makes any
> difference between major PG versions.

I don't see why it's better for the first line to have a big number
than the last line.  What difference does it make?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: archive_keepalive_command
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: PGDay Ecuador 2012: Call for papers