Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY in C function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY in C function
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYmaW_e3kg4q8Ufg_13tCWCovustQ=2OrFr-oi=ujyeQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] legitimacy of using PG_TRY , PG_CATCH , PG_END_TRY inC function  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> It'd probably be a good idea to expand on this in the sgml docs. This
> has confused quite anumber of people...

That's a good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath