Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYoLfNNq3g+SH8wFMg7y7KnFhsTprEPAG+0Xg56eX8E9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions  (Bjorn Munch <bjorn.munch@oracle.com>)
Responses Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Bjorn Munch <bjorn.munch@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 29/08 21.17, MauMau wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.  I belive PostgreSQL runs successfully on Solaris 10 and later,
>> because the binaries are published on the community site:
>>
>> http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v9.3beta2/solaris/
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice this thread earlier. Yes, I am building those
> binaries and I have had no problems building PostgreSQL and running
> the regression tests on Solaris 11. It would be quite unusual for
> something to work on Solaris 10 but not 11, but of course it could
> happen. There may have been a case or two which I now can't remember.

OK, patch committed and back-patched to 9.3.

The patch file turned out to be sorta garbled.  I'm not sure if a
broken version of diff was used to generate this or whether MauMau
hand-edited it after the fact, but the number of lines that were
indicated in the control lines didn't match the actual hunks, and
patch threw up.  So it took me 20 minutes to do what should have taken
5, but now it's done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL CPU overhead/optimization (was Master-slave visibility order)