Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZSzChx3+6dYadKzotaJGtYO0i6qsY0YNk_yEgQuev_Cg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> It's more convenient to carry the type information with the verifier itself,
> in backend code, in pg_dump, etc. Sure, you could have a separate "transfer"
> text format that has the prefix, and strip it out when the datum enters the
> system. But it is even simpler to have only one format, with the prefix, and
> use that everywhere.

I see your point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] too low cost of Bitmap index scan
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] too low cost of Bitmap index scan