Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZg8h6ChvG_rFfLa0oECQNc7x46Es7WEJWz=EeOgobQ_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
Responses Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 10:47 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
> I agree with this. But isn't this a mostly orthogonal problem? I mean,
> shouldn't we do both (or try to)?
>
> Also, if users complain about A and not about B, does that mean B is not
> an issue?
>
> Isn't ignoring "B" a bit like that? Of course, maybe B really is not
> worth worrying about. Or maybe this is not the right approach to address
> it, I don't know.

I'm just telling you what I think. I'm not purporting to have all of
the right answers.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: memory leak in dbase_redo()
Next
From: Mircea Cadariu
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals