Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal types |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaPGLz9qHenEE=k7QsrsfZcyjmkeGCWF1Tww+kb2f7i6A@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal types (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal
types
Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal types |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> Building on commit 8f9fe6edce358f7904e0db119416b4d1080a83aa, this adds >> protransform functions to the length coercions for numeric, varbit, timestamp, >> timestamptz, time, timetz and interval. This mostly serves to make more ALTER >> TABLE ALTER TYPE operations avoid a rewrite, including numeric(10,2) -> >> numeric(12,2), varbit(4) -> varbit(8) and timestamptz(2) -> timestamptz(4). >> The rules for varbit are exactly the same as for varchar. Numeric is slightly >> more complex: >> >> * Flatten calls to our length coercion function that solely represent >> * increases in allowable precision. Scale changes mutate every datum, so >> * they are unoptimizable. Some values, e.g. 1E-1001, can only fit into an >> * unconstrained numeric, so a change from an unconstrained numeric to any >> * constrained numeric is also unoptimizable. >> >> time{,stamp}{,tz} are similar to varchar for these purposes, except that, for >> example, plain "timestamptz" is equivalent to "timestamptz(6)". interval has >> a vastly different typmod format, but the principles applicable to length >> coercion remain the same. >> >> Under --disable-integer-datetimes, I'm not positive that timestamp_scale() is >> always a no-op when one would logically expect as much. Does there exist a >> timestamp such that v::timestamp(2) differs from v:timestamp(2)::timestamp(4) >> due to floating point rounding? Even if so, I'm fairly comfortable calling it >> a feature rather than a bug to avoid perturbing values that way. >> >> After these patches, the only core length coercion casts not having >> protransform functions are those for "bpchar" and "bit". For those, we could >> only optimize trivial cases of no length change. I'm not planning to do so. > > This is cool stuff. I will plan to review this once the CF starts. I've committed the numeric and varbit patches and will look at the temporal one next. I did notice one odd thing, though: sometimes we seem to get a rebuild on the toast index for no obvious reason: rhaas=# set client_min_messages=debug1; SET rhaas=# create table foo (a serial primary key, b varbit); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for serial column "foo.a" DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16430_index" on table "pg_toast_16430" NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "foo_pkey" for table "foo" DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo" CREATE TABLE rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit(4); DEBUG: rewriting table "foo" DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo" ALTER TABLE rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit; DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16430_index" on table "pg_toast_16430" ALTER TABLE Strangely, it doesn't happen if I add another column to the table: rhaas=# set client_min_messages=debug1; SET rhaas=# create table foo (a serial primary key, b varbit, c varbit); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for serial column "foo.a" DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16481_index" on table "pg_toast_16481" NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "foo_pkey" for table "foo" DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo" CREATE TABLE rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit(4); DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16490_index" on table "pg_toast_16490" DEBUG: rewriting table "foo" DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo" ALTER TABLE rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit; ALTER TABLE There may not be any particular harm in a useless rebuild of the TOAST table index (wasted effort excepted), but my lack of understanding of why this is happening causes me to fear that there's a bug, not so much in these patches as in the core alter table code that is enabling skipping table and index rebuilds. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgsql-hackers by date: