On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:32 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we ought to set a deadline of, say, beta2 or beta3 and have the RMT
> responsible for making sure it happens. Either of those releases would
> still give us at least a month or so to address feedback before GA, but
> they aren't so early as to require lots of rework due to last-minute
> changes.
That would be fine with me. I'd prefer beta2 -- I think it's really
awkward to try to talk up a forthcoming release when the list of major
features is blank for so long, and I think it's nice to give more
people time to bikeshed the list, too, if anyone is inclined to do
that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
