On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/17 22:59, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> I noted that no_priv_msg and not_owner_msg array been removed
>> and code fitted the code into aclcheck_error(). Actually that
>> makes the code more complex then what it used to be. I would
>> prefer the array rather then code been fitted into the function.
>
> There is an argument for having a big array versus the switch/case
> approach. But most existing code around object addresses uses the
> switch/case approach, so it's better to align it that way, I think.
> It's weird to have to maintain two different styles.
Eh, really? What about the two big arrays at the top of objectaddress.c?
(This is just a drive-by comment; I haven't looked at the details of
this patch.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
