On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The actual implementation could use another round of consideration. I
> wonder how this should interact with min_wal_size. Wouldn't
> min_wal_size = 0 already do what we need (if you could set it to 0,
> which is currently not possible)?
Hmm, would that actually disable recycling, or just make it happen only rarely?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
