Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobWYXPG8PqqqF-X21J3ev8o4K7rFxobGJufU=++cQ1smA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> That is very much appreciated! You writing a second implementation of the
> client-side support (libpq being the first) is very, very helpful, to
> validate that the protocol is sane, unambiguous, and adequately documented.

+1.

> Yes, we need to nail down the protocol and \password before beta. I am
> working on them now.

Good to hear.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Undefined psql variables