Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobeFEE_=BFCHfHM9BH-d4+=mr8TunFMdQAjEcyM2tm+Ow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: doc: fix wording describing the checkpoint_flush_after GUC  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 3:01 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hm, I really can't get excited about this. To me the "you" sounds worse, but
> whatever...

To me, it seems flat-out incorrect without the "you".

It might be better to rephrase the whole thing entirely so that it
doesn't need to address the reader, like allows you to force ->
forces.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Do away with a few backwards compatibility macros
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup