Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobkE_2DrM7iB08dSuEBJ=H=7W=quSFm4eEGyNfP6KeJgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I too tend to think that any users who use this masking facility would
> know to expect to get these failures on upgraded clusters with invalid
> pd_lower in meta pages.

I strongly disagree.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected
Next
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions