On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that should be OK, but:
>
> - It looks to me like you haven't done anything about the second heap
> pass. That should probably get a similar fix.
I was assuming this worked with Pavan's patch to remove second pass.
Not in any rush to commit this, so will wait till that is thru.
> - I think that this is going to screw up the reltuples calculation
> unless we fudge it somehow. The number of scanned pages has already
> been incremented by the time your new code is reached.
Yeh, I'll have a look at that in more detail. Thanks for the review.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
