Re: synchronized snapshots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: synchronized snapshots
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKF9XP+dx0aNrrj+ZaBE7MrgmbVSnyv=qz4NBJy+uaUrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: synchronized snapshots  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>> I'm also concerned that we are adding this to the BEGIN statement as
>> the only option.
>
> Huh?  The last version of the patch has it only as SET TRANSACTION
> SNAPSHOT, which I think is the right way.

Sorry Tom, didn't see your name on it earlier, thats not shown on the
main CF display and I didn't think to check on the detail. Please
continue.

I misread the SET TRANSACTION docs changes. Happy with that.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings