Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Jorge Solórzano
Subject Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?
Date
Msg-id CA+cVU8OkJurdocJtB6UFneF7+uL1q5XAKVW5yzfb0KzWUBeW9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [JDBC] Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Don't worry Dave, I know both might be busy, there is no urgency.

If I can help in the review/approval process let me know.


Jorge Solórzano

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
Hi Jorge,


sorry for the late reply. I think both Vladimir and I are just busy. I know he's at a conf in St Petersburg (or Moscow)

I don't think there is any urgency ?


On 2 November 2017 at 12:09, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dave, the merging (review) of PRs has been a bit slow, is there anything that I can do, to make the process faster?

Jorge Solórzan
​o​

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?
Next
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10?