On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:59 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> (3) even though it should
> win for Jeff's test case by skipping workers entirely if an initial
> RWF_NOWAIT attempt succeeds, you could presumably change some
> parameters and make it lose
... not to mention that with v19 patches even that effect should go
away when it automatically scales the worker pool to the perfect™
size.