Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLJJ5bs2JQzBPOo87UhMT2LhdN+5yJW2uNuz8RZ6p7+SA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:59 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> (3) even though it should
> win for Jeff's test case by skipping workers entirely if an initial
> RWF_NOWAIT attempt succeeds, you could presumably change some
> parameters and make it lose

... not to mention that with v19 patches even that effect should go
away when it automatically scales the worker pool to the perfect™
size.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Should io_method=worker remain the default?
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: PgStat_HashKey padding issue when passed by reference