Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
Date
Msg-id CA+q6zcW5s4X0npkoBhHCmWQwRPCRnkNpnZq_q1MNEHcDCn2xpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:05 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > > Nothing changed since then, but also the patch got not enough review to say
> > > that there was substantial feedback. I'll move it to the next CF.
> >
> > I would have suggested to mark the patch as returned with feedback
> > instead as the thing does not apply for some time now, and the author
> > has been notified about a rebase.
>
> Agreed and sorry for the late reply.
>
> The design of this patch would need to be reconsidered based on
> suggestions and discussions we had before. I'll propose it again after
> considerations.

Well, taking into account this information, then yes, it makes sense and I'll
mark it as "Returned with feedback", thanks!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [Todo item] Add entry creation timestamp column topg_stat_replication
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: oddity in costing aggregate pushdown paths