Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Jungwirth
Subject Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id CA+renyXKiEY1ZDZw3Vit0=5-v_=QmYVzt5+66Xqu_1uaUF4Sdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: Exclusion constraints on partitioned tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:06 AM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:05 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> > I'm not sure what value we would get from testing this with btree_gist,
> > but if we wanted to do that, then adding a new test file to the
> > btree_gist sql/ directory would seem reasonable to me.
> >
> > (I would make the test a little bit bigger than you had shown, like
> > insert a few values.)
> >
> > If you want to do that, please send another patch.  Otherwise, I'm ok to
> > commit this one.
>
> I can get you a patch tonight or tomorrow. I think it's worth it since
> btree_gist uses different strategy numbers than ordinary gist.

Patch attached.

Regards,
Paul

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum