Re: Show method of index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Show method of index |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA8FCA71-E056-43B5-9505-52ECE5AADE3C@enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Show method of index (decibel <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Show method of index
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
One advantage of the current arrangement is that the constraints and triggers are almost (though not quite) in the same form as the command to create them. It would be sad to lose that competely. Is there any room for a compromise? Something that just reduces the clutter incrementally instead of completely reorganizing it? Are there any commonalities between footnotes that could be elided if they were grouped together differently? -- Greg On 19 May 2009, at 09:41, decibel <decibel@decibel.org> wrote: > On May 18, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> decibel <decibel@decibel.org> writes: >>> The gripe I have with \d is that the "footnotes" are very hard to >>> scan through once you have more than a few things on a table. What >>> I'd like to see is a version that provides the same information, but >>> in a tabular output. >> >> Hmm, I'm not visualizing what you have in mind that would be better? >> The difficulty with the "footnotes" is exactly that the information >> isn't very tabular ... > > Instead of... > > Indexes: > "debit_cards_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (payment_instrument_id) > Check constraints: > "debit_cards__payment_instrument_type_id_must_equal_1" CHECK > (payment_instrument_type_id = 1) > Foreign-key constraints: > "debit_cards_customer_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (customer_id) > REFERENCES customers(id) > "debit_cards_payment_instrument_status_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY > (payment_instrument_status_id) REFERENCES > payment_instruments.payment_instrument_statuses(id) > "debit_cards_payment_instrument_type_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY > (payment_instrument_type_id) REFERENCES > payment_instruments.payment_instrument_types(id) > Triggers: > debit_cards__deny_delete BEFORE DELETE ON > payment_instruments.debit_cards FOR EACH STATEMENT EXECUTE PROCEDURE > tools.tg_disallow() > debit_cards__dupe_id BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON > payment_instruments.debit_cards FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > payment_instruments.tg_payment_instruments_unique() > payment_instrument_status_history AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON > payment_instruments.debit_cards FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE > payment_instruments.tg_payment_instrument_status_history() > Inherits: payment_instruments > > Something more like... > > Inherits: payment_instruments > > Indexes: > Name | Options | Method | Columns > ------------------+---------+--------+--------------------------- > debit_cards_pkey | PRIMARY | btree | payment_instrument_id, ... > > Check constraints: > Name | > Constraint > ------------------------------------------------------ > +------------------------------- > debit_cards__payment_instrument_type_id_must_equal_1 | > payment_instrument_type_id = 1 > > Foreign-key constraints: > Name | Key > Fields | Schema | > Table | Foreign Keys > ----------------------------------------------- > +------------------------------+--------------------- > +-----------------------------+-------------- > debit_cards_customer_id_fkey | > customer_id | public | > customers | id > debit_cards_payment_instrument_status_id_fkey | > payment_instrument_status_id | payment_instruments | > payment_instrument_statuses | id > debit_cards_payment_instrument_type_id_fkey | > payment_instrument_type_id | payment_instruments | > payment_instrument_types | id > > Triggers: > Name | When | DIU | Level | > Schema | Function > -----------------------------------+--------+-----+----------- > +---------------------+--------------------------------------- > debit_cards__deny_delete | BEFORE | D | STATEMENT | > tools | tg_disallow() > debit_cards__dupe_id | BEFORE | I | ROW | > payment_instruments | tg_payment_instruments_unique() > payment_instrument_status_history | AFTER | IU | ROW | > payment_instruments | tg_payment_instrument_status_history() > > This format is a bit longer, but I think it makes it much easier to > find information, especially on tables that have a lot of footnotes. > > It might also be nice to have a command that just shows the options > on a table, and one that just shows the table columns... > -- > Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org > Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
pgsql-hackers by date: