Re: REPACK and naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: REPACK and naming
Date
Msg-id CAA-aLv7iRMyCi7m2yVg1uosNskQbHGV2Zr6WV=WkQ8TQ1SFTbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REPACK and naming  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 17 Sept 2025, 03:01 Robert Haas, <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 7:42 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Peter E suggested that since we have REINDEX to rewrite indexes, then
> the command to rewrite tables should be RETABLE.  I haven't been able to
> get myself to like that idea, and also I think that was a bit
> tongue-in-cheek, but if you like RETABLE better than REPACK, then maybe
> we can have a vote to decide which one of those names to use.  However,
> I don't think that change would make a tremendous difference, and also I
> don't think RETABLE is enough of an English name to become a command
> name.

I think RETABLE is not a proposal to be taken seriously. That's
extremely confusing.

I don't love the name REPACK, but I think it's good enough. If we come
up with something better, great.

COMPACT?

Thom

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK and naming