Re: Parallel copy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Parallel copy
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JsVc_vyQPmraod3vpyWgP9mfyvV56OOd94zq8jdUNPqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel copy  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:16 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh and Bharath,
>
> Seems like the Parallel Copy patch is regarding RI_TRIGGER_PK as
> parallel-unsafe.
> Can you explain why this is?
>

I don't think we need to restrict this case and even if there is some
reason to do so then probably the same should be mentioned in the
comments.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthieu Garrigues
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Next
From: Kasahara Tatsuhito
Date:
Subject: Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process