On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:46 AM Takeshi Ideriha
<iderihatakeshi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for reporting the issue.
> I was able to reproduce the issue by modifying 022_twophase_cascade.pl
> accordingly.
>
> The scan for toast index is actually done under systable_getnext_ordered,
> where HandleConcurrentAbort() is called. So it seems to me that this
> scan is actually safe for concurrent abort in logical decoding.
> Logic around HandleConcurrentAbort is intorduced
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/7259736a6e5b7c7588fff9578370736a6648acbb.
>
> Though I may not understand the logic around HandleConcurrentAbort
> fully and I am not sure not-setting bsysscan at
> systable_beginscan_ordered is intentional,
> it seems to me setting and unsetting a bsysscan flag in
> systable_beginscan_ordered and systable_endscan_ordered would resolve
> the issue.
>
We forgot to set/unset the flag in functions
systable_beginscan_ordered and systable_endscan_ordered. BTW,
shouldn't this occur even without prepare transaction? If so, we need
to backpatch this till 14.
Also, it is better to have a test for this, and let's ensure that the
new test doesn't increase the regression time too much if possible.
One minor point:
+
+ /*
+ * If CheckXidAlive is set then set a flag to indicate that system table
The indentation in the first comment line seems off.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
