Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KF=kt0_Jrr2nyCa9-BF1sycFyZfE0TYF4jcTF=HF6YWw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
RE: Adding a LogicalRepWorker type field
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:08 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The main patch for adding the worker type enum has been pushed [1].
>
> Here is the remaining (rebased) patch for changing some previous
> cascading if/else to switch on the LogicalRepWorkerType enum instead.
>

I see this as being useful if we plan to add more worker types. Does
anyone else see this remaining patch as an improvement?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Rethink the wait event names for postgres_fdw, dblink and etc