Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KUQhwCFnFGm3UpgoVpOTvAxo_80S68nsMUsjrST3aNnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As Ashutosh suggests I will go more for the backpatching approach because the synchronized_standby_slots parameter
impactsthe last 2 major versions and this problem is critical on production environments. 
>

Fair enough. Let's wait for the related issue being discussed in email
[1] to be fixed.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwFud-cvthCTfusBfKHBS6Jj6kdAPTdLWKvP2qjUX6L_wA%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid primary_slot_name triggers warnings in all processes on reload