Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KwE6KXY2p_yw_w91iJZKBFRiCMekm_z6FTw_BMy+b8tA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication  (Benoit Lobréau <benoit.lobreau@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:56 PM Benoit Lobréau
<benoit.lobreau@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
> After reading the thread and doing a bit of testing, the problem seems
> significant and is still present. The fact that it's probably not well
> known makes it more concerning, in my opinion. I was wondering what
> could be done to help move this topic forward (given my limited abilities)?
>

You can help with the review/test of the proposed patch. Also, help
with the performance impact of the patch, if possible. Shlok has done
some performance testing of the patch which you can perform
independently and then Sawada-San has asked for more performance tests
in his last email (1) which you can also help with.

(1) - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoDoWc8MWTyKtmNF_606bcW6J0gV%3D%3Dr%3DVmPXKUN-e3o9ew%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Restrict copying of invalidated replication slots
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning