Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LGPP7__u085PkythqoW-zet8umcAfsoytFE26v7Hr8aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:41 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We need to think of a predictable
> > way to test this path which may not be difficult. But I guess it would
> > be better to wait for some feedback from the field about this feature
> > before adding more to it and anyway it shouldn't be a big deal to add
> > this later as well.
>
> Agreed to hear some feedback before adding it. It's not an urgent feature.
>

Okay, Thanks! AFAIK, there is no pending patch left in this proposal.
If so, I think it is better to close the corresponding CF entry.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker