Re: pg_utility ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sami Imseih
Subject Re: pg_utility ?
Date
Msg-id CAA5RZ0sfb=wZ2umD33pTwxbYO+Z=J=iQegfcFkhJCbT59Fh_cg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_utility ?  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
> pg_utility vacuum -t tab1 -t tab2               # what vacuumdb does
> pg_utility analyze -t tab1 -t tab2              # what vacuumdb -Z does
> pg_utility vacuum analyze -t tab1 -t tab2       # what vacuumdb -z does
> pg_utility cluster -t tab1 -t tab2              # what clusterdb does
> pg_utility reindex -t tab1 -t tab2              # what reindexdb does

Is the idea to get rid of most of bin/scripts and replace them with a single
pg_utility? or will it just be a wrapper for the existing utilities? meaning
they will still work stand-alone.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Checkpointer write combining
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: nbtree VACUUM's REDO routine doesn't clear page's VACUUM cycle ID