Re: Foreign key validation failure in 18beta1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amul Sul
Subject Re: Foreign key validation failure in 18beta1
Date
Msg-id CAAJ_b958t_ZvgSxCaDEAq9in3rYoRzdyx+GLv-KoHF6G6sjcAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign key validation failure in 18beta1  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 10:31 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Jun-04, jian he wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 12:14 PM Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > v7 is way more intuitive compared with v5, v6.
>
> Agreed, this version is better than the previous ones.  I split it as
> two commits, for NOT VALID and NOT ENFORCED separately, and modified some
> comments a bit as well as the commit messages.
>

Yeah, it makes sense to have this as a separate commit. Thank you!

Regards,
Amul



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly