Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_b5bncDjzZwquj1G1AdKF4-UcPjTKwfCyrt6Acj9SfkUw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum  (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:36 PM Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> On 14.01.2025 22:51, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
>
> There is a typo on committed vacuumlazy.c file
>  * If the TID store fills up in phase I, vacuum suspends phase I, proceeds to
>  * phases II and II, cleaning up the dead tuples referenced in the current TID
>  * store. This empties the TID store resumes phase I.
>
> Probably you meant phases II and III

Oops. Thanks for catching this. I'll fix that and the following
sentence in the main patch proposed in this thread to avoid extra
noise.

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: IWYU annotations
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Purpose of wal_init_zero