Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_bivVarAaATYTL9bKHjcsfzyPkOt1yzUACbM_X_FOQecA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:11 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, are we still lacking test coverage for this on v17 and up?

Yep. I have been procrastinating on swapping all this back into my
brain. I'll start working on it today. I think I just take the
reverted test and make the UPDATE a DELETE, set mwm 64 kB, make the
table have 9000 rows and maybe consider using your:

delete from test where ctid::text like '%,2__)';

But, unfortunately, to be able to commit it, I'll have to remember
everything about this. I'll begin now...

- Melanie



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Next
From: Dimitrios Apostolou
Date:
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward