Re: Why is parula failing? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Why is parula failing?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvoZWAp5cR5yUeXBfGbmSfy8VTZAJQXi8Vzrvds8TkwCYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Why is parula failing?  ("Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Why is parula failing?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 21:03, Tharakan, Robins <tharar@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > It would be good to have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 on this machine for a while.
>
> - Have set log_autovacuum_min_duration=0 on parula and a test run came out okay.
> - Also added REL_16_STABLE to the branches being tested (in case it matters here).

Thanks for doing that.

I see PG_16_STABLE has failed twice already with the same issue.  I
don't see any autovacuum / autoanalyze in the log, so I guess that
rules out auto vacuum activity causing this.

Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging,
so don't get to know what reltuples was set to.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: add AVX2 support to simd.h
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Add new error_action COPY ON_ERROR "log"