Re: Support tid range scan in parallel? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqALm+k7FyfdQdCw1yF_8HojvR61YRrNhwRQPE=zSmnQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 at 14:07, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I went over this again today and only made a few whitespace
> adjustments in the tests. I've now pushed the resulting patch.

This seems to have caused issues on skink [1] under Valgrind.  The
problem seems to be that initscan() does not always initialise
rs_startblock. I'm now trying to figure out if there's some reason for
that, or if that's been overlooked at some point.

David

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2025-11-27%2002%3A17%3A35



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?
Next
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: doc: Fix incorrect wording for --file in pg_dump