Re: REPACK and naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marcos Pegoraro
Subject Re: REPACK and naming
Date
Msg-id CAB-JLwaRXQPZ7Sj42-66dXtvkrx=5rxW7w=vszppekUxspDiAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REPACK and naming  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: REPACK and naming
REPACK and naming
List pgsql-hackers
Em ter., 16 de set. de 2025 às 23:01, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> escreveu:
I think RETABLE is not a proposal to be taken seriously. That's
extremely confusing.

This feature could be used in a future version to rearrange fields in a table, for better padding.
I don't think we have another one available for this purpose.

CREATE TABLE T(A text, B integer, C bigint, D integer);

We could have something like
RETABLE T USING(B, D, C, A)

So REPACK isn't the best for this, if this feature would exist some day.

regards
Marcos

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Burd
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Apply