Re: LSN as a recovery target - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: LSN as a recovery target
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQfQSaFf6bk7LU-jnK15ZDHVvngYM+rOrgNWTj40MkZgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LSN as a recovery target  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: LSN as a recovery target
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2016 at 05:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Everything else looks in good order.
>>
>> Committed. Thanks.
>
> Thanks for the commit!

By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch adding
the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread. Perhaps
that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring
potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind
much. Just that's worth mentioning.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactional enum additions - was Re: Alter or rename enum value
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: autonomous transactions