Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRFhUv+GX=eH1bo7xYHS79-gRj1ecu2QoQtHvX9RS=JYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cacheentries  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cacheentries
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Six new syscaches in 665d1fa was conflicted and 3-way merge
> worked correctly. The new syscaches don't seem to be targets of
> this patch.

To be honest, I am not completely sure what to think about this patch.
Moved to next CF as there is a new version, and no new reviews to make
the discussion perhaps move on.
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Supporting huge pages on Windows