On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
> On 04/03/2016 23:34, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> New design discussions are a little bit late for 9.6 I am afraid :(
>> Perhaps we should consider this patch as returned with feedback for
>> the time being? The hook approach is not something I'd wish for if we
>> can improve in-core facility that would help user to decide better how
>> to tune autovacuum parameters.
>
> Yes, it's clearly not suited for the final commitfest. I just closed the
> patch as "returned with feedback".
>
> I'll work on the feedbacks I already had to document a wiki page, and
> wait for this commitfest to be more or less finished before starting a
> new thread on autovacuum instrumentation design.
OK, thanks.
--
Michael
