Re: low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqS0BU-3kwXB72p+1-jsXFbUApKgY2FqLcn6r6mNXHmNxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5  (thomas veymont <thomas.veymont@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:22 PM, thomas veymont
<thomas.veymont@gmail.com> wrote:
> as far as I remember these settings were for faster bulk loading.
>
> in 9.5 we set:
> max_wal_size = 6GB                      #
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/release-9-5.html, max_wal_size =
> (3 * checkpoint_segments) * 16MB
> #min_wal_size = 80MB
>
> though I tried max_wal_size = 3GB (default is 1GB) and did not notice any
> improvment.

And do you see changes if you increase min_wal_size? This will
increase the number of WAL segments recycled instead of removed at
each checkpoint.
--
Michael


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jerome Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: question on parsing postgres sql queries
Next
From: Artur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: FTS with more than one language in body and with unknown query language?