Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTBcGS-1DLX-QtN=eL6eFOQ5Q6rFSAyo794Yh=D0Kwzgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:33:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> How did you figure
>> that that was the version used, anyway?
>
> I asked Bruce at one point.

So we are trying to use the same version over the years to keep code
consistent across back-branches? Do you think we should try to use a
newer version instead with each pgindent run? That would induce a
rebasing cost when back-patching, but we cannot stay with the same
version of perltidy forever either...
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: broken tests