Re: [GENERAL] Logging at schema level - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Logging at schema level
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTivtm+DgkzV5XZg_wdoqj4Z1rmjz=pp4h=8A1r6QqdZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Logging at schema level  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:21 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
> if you have per schema logging, where should that get logged ?
>
> you could implement per DATABASE logging, if you A) add the database name to
> the log_prefix, and B) feed your logs to a program that understands this and
> splits them out to a log file per database.    you could also do this on a
> per user basis. but, schema is something very dynamic, its a namespace
> within a database, and queries can touch multiiple schemas.

Personally, I understand that as logging the query N times, once per
schema, if it touches N schemas, making the exercise part of parsing.
I think that it would be possible to use the parser hook to achieve
that actually, as you need extra lookups for WITH clauses and such.
--
Michael


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Streaming Replication archive_command is really needed?
Next
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Logging at schema level