[HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTuXuyEoVKcWcExh_b0uAjgWd_14KfGLrCTccBZ=VA0KA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
List pgsql-hackers
Hi all,

After thinking a bit on the subject, I have decided to submit a patch
to do $subject. This makes pg_receivewal more consistent with
pg_basebackup. This option is mainly useful for testing, something
that becomes way more doable since support for --endpos has been
added.

Unsurprisingly, --synchronous and --no-sync are incompatible options.
Thanks,
-- 
Michael

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] per-sesson errors after interrupting CLUSTER pg_attrdef
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Remove secondary checkpoint