On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)
Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?
Regards,
Marti
