On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Hmm. So it works for you on exactly the same version that the server runs. > That's interesting. Is there something wrong in how we run it? I wonder if > its broken by ccache. What we have is:
It might be worth blowing away ccache's cache just to see if it's cached anything bogus.
I've done that and completed a run. AFAICT it's still showing the same issue, right?
