On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > What about the attached?
The new positions look good to me, still aren't you missing the case where a SQL command is found and exec_replication_command returns false? This should be switched to idle as well.
Yes. Of course. I can't read. That's the same as the notice below about it not returning false -- I managed to miss the extra if() there, and thought it always exited with ERROR.
:O
+ /* Report to pgstat that this process is running */ + pgstat_report_activity(STATE_RUNNING, NULL); Bonus points if cmd_string is used instead of string? This way, you can know what is the replication command running ;)
Do we want that though? That would be a compat break at least, wouldn't it?
> It's still quite a bit weird that we call this process "walsender" when it > does other things as well. But the ship sailed on that many years ago, > changing that completely now would not be worth the breakage.
ps shows walsender as well, that's a reason why "walsender" has been decided.
Right. It's just a weird term for what it is. But it's the term that we've always used, so we can't go change it now.